|
Monday, 05 December 2011 14:21 |
|
In this work, the performance of the most common extraction procedure (EPA Method 3060A) using NaOH–Na2CO3 solutions was evaluated using X-ray absorption near edge structure spectroscopy (XANES), which enables the quantification of Cr(VI) directly in the solid state. Results obtained with both methods were compared for three solid samples with different matrices: a soil containing chromite ore processing residue (COPR), a loamy soil, and a paint sludge. Results showed that Cr(VI) contents determined by the two methods differ significantly, and that the Method 3060A procedure underestimated the Cr(VI) content in all studied samples. The underestimation is particularly pronounced for COPR. The low extraction recovery for EPA Method 3060A was found to be the main reason.
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es201002g
|
Comments